PortfoliosLab logo
^TNX vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^TNX and QYLD is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

^TNX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^TNX:

-0.12

QYLD:

0.30

Sortino Ratio

^TNX:

-0.01

QYLD:

0.57

Omega Ratio

^TNX:

1.00

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

^TNX:

-0.05

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

^TNX:

-0.24

QYLD:

1.14

Ulcer Index

^TNX:

10.58%

QYLD:

5.06%

Daily Std Dev

^TNX:

22.02%

QYLD:

19.08%

Max Drawdown

^TNX:

-93.78%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

^TNX:

-45.49%

QYLD:

-10.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -6.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TNX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 6.85%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.67% annualized return.


^TNX

YTD

-4.37%

1M

-0.61%

6M

1.56%

1Y

-1.71%

5Y*

45.18%

10Y*

6.85%

QYLD

YTD

-6.31%

1M

0.00%

6M

-5.29%

1Y

5.62%

5Y*

8.30%

10Y*

7.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^TNX vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^TNX is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^TNX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -93.78%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^TNX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...